The best FEA software for Structural analysis and highly recommended for engineers and researchers.

As a civil engineer, ANSYS helps me a lot for my research works during my final year academic period. The GUI is pretty simple and user-friendly. There are plenty of online learning materials available on the internet and it is the best tool for creating a mesh and doing finite element analysis(FEA). The run time for the final results is acceptable when compared to the other softwares like Abacus and etc.

A little bit expensive software in terms of pricing. Still, need some improvements in some specific areas.

I have used ANSYS and its geometry optimization tool. I have been involved in developing software packages which uses ANSYS as the solver.

I liked the feature that ANSYS has added to the Workbench for geometry optimization.

I belive the modeling part of ANSYS can be improved to be more user friendly, so that it would be much easier to use the powerfull tools that ANSYS provides.

It is easy to use and the Ansys customer support is very helpful and responsive.

Some functionality isn't obvious. It is hard to troubleshoot what isn't working in a simulation sometimes.

We are using Fluent to create a flow model of vehicle dynamic in order to obtain related air resistance and improve our vehicle body design. It's quite useful and reliable, general results are %98 identical with wind tunnel results which are measured via tools.

Reliable data for CFD analysis in pre-test phase.

It requires very high computer specification for seamless experience.

Overall it's great software. Once you get your hands on it, you get your problems solved in no time. I'm currently using this software for my BE project in mechanical engineering.

I loved Meshing tool and graphics shown in modelling. Software has different analysis options like structural,vibration,thermal,fluid analysis and many more. I have used this software for structural and thermal analysis mainly. Great use in Finite Element Analysis. It saves time of experimentation.

The hard part is to learn all about this software and its features. It's not easy to use and it's bit of expensive software.

I've been using this program since university. Best way to run analysis based on FEM.

Ansys has so many module to run analysis what do you need.

You must be careful when preparation of analysis. You will forgot the tools and details If you don't use this program continuously.

This software is a very helpful software for my daily job. I use ANSYS structural for my FEA analysis. This software provides me a very good result with few errors.

This software has one of the best hyper-elastic material analysis. ANSYS Structural provides the best FEA result. Curve fitting option is best in this software.

Transition between tetra and hexa mesh can be difficult.

Quick analysis.

The wide availability of elements for any particular usage and the reliable solver are the major plus points. Variety of boolean operations are very easy to use.

The post processing is not user friendly. The contours and graphs displayed are in old fashioned style. The scriptting is also not comfortable to use.

Working as a mechanical engineer I was simulating a fluid flow with particles in a pipe.

I used ANSYS Workbench to perform many analysis on complex fluid flow problems with a temperature gradient to calculate the stress on the pipe.

ANSYS can crash pretty easily and lose the current analysis or mesh that was processing. Having a machine with high specs counters this well

For our company its the construction optimisation and problem-solving where we have benefited most.

ANSYS really changed the way we model our equipment, vibratory machinery. Until now we were relying primarily on our experience and expertise. With modal analysis, we were able to identify problems that weren't obvious before. This in return helped us to optimise our constructions and be more competitive on the market.

The software is great but it is also as good as the engineer who is interpreting the results. Some areas of the software still need to be improved like the mesh generator.

We were doing the projectile impact, depth of penetration and brittle material analysis in ANSYS. It is a good software for the simulation of plastic and brittle materials. It provides easy tools to perform analysis. The only area it lacks in postprocessing.

The user interface of the software is very good. It has all the tools to perform Explicit and Implicit Analysis. Mesh generation is easy to use and in the newer version, you can easily create complex geometry. Good software to analyze brittle materials.

The material library is not that updated for explicit materials and it could have been improved. Apart from that, there are fewer tools for postprocessing and it could have been improved. Postprocessing is the most important part of the analysis and ANSYS has some limitations in postprocessing.

ANSYS has gone and made a designer's job easier. I mean,most designers will agree that undertaking analysis the conventional way is, lets be honest, way too tedious in this era. Now ANSYS has gone and made things much simpler for us. And with the user friendly GUI of the Workbench, ANSYS has taken ease and reliability of analysis several notches up. That being said, it is also to be noted that with the above mentioned user-friendliness inclusions has enhanced the potency of the software. The accuracy and reliability of solutions dished out by the software is spot on.

Excellent GUI. Very user friendly. High accuracy and reliability. Has numerous modules for all types of analysis.

Reading mesh of imported geometry should be worked upon a little bit. Several instances have occurred wherein mesh was not read correctly leading to waste of time.

It's already a popular software for simulation. I like the way it integrated designing tools in it and every tool has a description so that new people don't find it unfriendly to use.

Lots of tools that need to understand for a complete analysis.

I've always used ANSYS Workbench and APDL (up to some extent) in the past and what I really like about these two is that it gives the user to define and model the elements in a FEA problem in great detail. This in turn leads to higher reliability of the results.

The geometric modeling of the ANSYS Workbench isn't that great as it does not offer the flexibility in modeling the part, thus rendering ANSYS Workbench a fairly good analysis tool.

It has a lot of features. You can design a part, analyze it for fatigue, heat&fluid, modal, displacements, stress values whatever you want. I suggest every mechanical engineer to use this program for your problems.

It provides you results in a very good shape. You can see the graphs, animations on analyzed part, numbers etc.

Some features could be very detailed and hard to figure out.

ANSYS Fluent is my primary tool for CFD. It has a better correlation with physical world. Always we see most similar results between CAE and Test.

ANSYS Fluent is a well-known CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) Software in the industry. It's using by wide-range of companies from automotive, aviation, defense, marine, agriculture, chemistry, ...etc. industries. It has a well oriented graphical user interface (GUI). You can easily set the type of CAE analyses and boundary conditions. If you need a quick setup for your CAE case, you should use Text-User-Interface (TUI). You should write your commands into a text file and execute on the computing cluster. That's the easy way to run an analysis.

It is so hard to debug the TUI errors. You could spend much resource (CPU) for this kind of stuff because it takes so long time.

During my mechanical engineering studies, the subjects I most enjoyed were "computer-aided design" and "Finite Element Method". For this reason my thesis was oriented in the line of mechanical design, "design of a pin-on-disk friction machine", you can apply load states on pieces of interest, determine their stresses, deformations, safety factor, fatigue, buckling between others. In the same way, repeat the process until achieving the convergence of results, redefining the meshes on a particular element. It is simply incredible.

In addition to all the different types of analysis available to apply in the pieces, you have a really friendly interface. Your pieces can be made in the Ansys DesignModeler program or be imported from other 3D CAD tools. In addition, you have refining tools for meshing to focus on areas of interest, either by its state of charge or its particular shape.

If the size of the element chosen in the meshes is very small, the simulation can take an excessive time. The issue would be related to the processing capacity of the computer.

over all good experience.

It is good software for electrical engineers and it is helpful in modeling and testing of new apparatus and its behavior under different conditions . It is very easy to learn and there are many resources available help in learning it efficiently.

The interface is a bit confusing for new user and for beginners, it is difficult to obtain desired results. there is a need of little improvement in help.

The solver is robust and the user interface is easy to understand and manipulate once you are familiar with it. Our results have been highly successful when validated in the field.

For a new user, it can be difficult to learn. It is also quite expensive, but you do get what you pay for.

I used this software for my Master's degree research. it provided me with satisfactory results and helped to save a lot of my time. these results were compared with experimental results and they almost matched.

First of all this software is not for specific engineering it can be used by every engineering department. it contains different types of tools that can fulfill the requirements of all engineering fields. it is also a user-friendly software and complete user guidance is available. This software has the ability to accept geometries designed in other softwares. this software basically consists of four different steps. first is a Modular design where the user can design his/her own geometry. The second step consists of meshing where geometry is divided into smaller portions to apply the required equation solvers. the third step is setup where boundary conditions are applied. the last step contains results where it can be analyzed through tabular or graphical representation.

This software is very heavy and requires a powerful computing power for accurate results. it crushes during simulations after which you will have to restart all of your work.

I have used ANSY's for static & dynamic analysis. Tried a lot learn in the beginning correct but then it's now easy to process any analysis at work.

Any type of analysis can be done for engineering simulations. It helped a lot during college projects and now continues at work. Integration with different modeling programs improved a lot.

It's not an easy software so takes sometime to get experienced. But then simulations, CAE works get really easy after learning phase.

I have used Ansys in some of my projects like CFD simulation and I must say that the results i have helped me a lot in my job.

I mostly like in Ansys import geometry from other parts of softwares.I can import easly geometry in different file.Another thing is Meshing geometry.To mesh geometry is very simple and you can increase resolution of cells very fast .

I like more Ansys CFX because is very flexible in running Turbomachinery case studies and I can change parameters very fast and take high quality results.

Great tool for CFD and FEA with accurate and correlating results with the experimental analysis. I used this tool when I was an undergraduate for fluid flow studies and thermal analysis and now at my work place I am using it for air flow modeling in Mechanical Ventilation.

ANSYS Fluent gives very accurate and reliable simulation results in Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) analysis. It has an excellent graphical user interface (GUI) where you can easily select the type of CAE analysis and other parameters for most of the simulations while using user defined functions (UDF) to handle complex and customized simulations. Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) analysis is another great feature in this software which enables the multiphysics study of fluids and structure interaction.

ANSYS requires heavy computational power to give accurate results for complex analysis. Creating complex models in DesignModeler is harder compared to other modeling tools.

I make different projects in this and recommend it.

I really like it's different modeling tools, easy to use and understandable. Good capacity for handling large data.

It's user interface is little bit complex compare to its competitor software's like solidworks and catia

great FEA software, that keeps getting better

gives powerful structure analysis options in relatively user friendly environment. You will not find easier to use mechanical FEA software that grows in useful features with each release - for example topology optimization in v18 is really what most of mechanical engineers were waiting for in FEA tool.

quite limited meshing options (very often do not recognize simple sweep geometries and created tetra mesh)

Can be used to solve so many different types of mechanical and structural problems.

This software has so many capabilities. It can be used to simulate simple beam bending problems, as well as much more complex problems like bridges and cyclic loading problems. If you get good with the command bar, you can just edit code, and read from the file to run through problems quickly. The help menu is a life-saver.

Not everything is intuitive, and with no "undo" button, it can be frustrating. Getting used to the commands takes a little time. Navigating through the drop-down lists takes lots of time.

excellent software would recommend it other others and businesses.

what I liked the most about the software is the end result once you have proceed your design and want to check how the fluid dynamic works on it example in a car park how the smoke extract will work and remove smoke and fumes. this is the best part seeing that your design works and this can be used as evidence that in the real world it should work.

it is very complicated and time consuming, if you don't have a super computer it can take ours to run the program .

-A must-have for Engineers.

-You can perform tons of simulation using ANSYS including thermal, static, etc.

-Sometimes it takes a lot of time for a solution to converge.

It very capable validation software is used for engineering with having complex interface and performance failure.

Various engineering tools for any kind company are offered by ANSYS. It has a great training/help documents with hyperlinks which you can reach easily what you what. You can also create your own models and run it. Very easy to mesh complex geometry of designs. Compatible with other modeling tools such as Hypermesh.

It has not a user friendly interface. Sometimes it crashes and causes loss of work. Every tool needs license which may be expensive to get all of them. It can be hard to find the issue with your model in Fluent.

Ansys is used for high definition details regarding sensitive applications of the structural work. With it's small scale simulations every detail can be detailed perfectly.

Ansys is one of the best softwares to carryout small scale modeling work which are related to structural works. It has a great simulation ability to demonstrate results with perfect outcomes. Software is not only limited for structural works but can be used for other engineering aspects effectively.

If you are interested in working with ansys you definitely have to follow a course related to the software. Otherwise you won't be able to get the full use of available functions.

After working with this vendor for years I can say we have had the best support from them. Most requests are handled without issue and always willing to work with us.

Learning curve is very steep and even with documentation some of the features need support assistance. I also find it difficult to support each release separately for every user. In most cases it is easier to skip the initial and dot 2 release.

I overall I’m very satisfied with this software and would definitely use it.

Ability to solve problems of any kind of difficulty. I use it for heating system simulation and the plots it produces are perfect. Also such simulation can partially replace real experiments.

Very complicated and not enough practical and cleanly explained tutorials

ANSYS provides a wide array of tools to help model complex systems. Whether it be structural analysis for loaded parts (ANSYS mechanical , or computational fluid dynamics simulations (ANSYS Fluent), ANSYS gives users confidence that they can verify their designs quite accurately. ANSYS also provides many examples and documentation online to help learn the basics of the software, as well as more advanced modeling techniques.

As is expected with such a robust software, the learning curve for any new user is quite steep. Navigating the multitude of menu layers is not intuitive at first. The built in CAD modeling package in ANSYS is also not nearly as useful as more dedicated CAD softwares, such as Solidworks or Creo. It would be nice to not always have to import a model into ANSYS when the design gets a bit too complex.

ANSYS is a great software that can be useful for simulations

- Great software for simulations that shows visualisations for the user

- UI needs improvement to navigate between tools easily

I have used ANSYS to simulate deformation and thermal protrusion in nanometer scale in the presence of an embedded micro-heater elements. The simulation results show good agreement with experimental results.

The software allows to solve multi-Physics problems from mechanical deformation, heat transfer, to computational fluid dynamics. ANSYS Workbenchs is a great platform for pre-processing, meshing, and post-processing procedure that makes the software very intuitive and easy to use.

Too expensive and it has limited number of nodes/elements for students.

excellent simulation softwares covers all the aspects of fluid dynamics, structutal and electromagnetism

very expensive, need excellent skill and knowledge,

One of the best softwares for FEA, and one of the best for engineerings. The main pro, is the ammount of features that you have, because there are a lot of software in one, that allows you to connect between them.

As they have a lot of software into it, it's hard to really uses them all, you have to choose wisely.

I do like the software more than solidworks but not better than creo, but it's a good software for the working you need to do with lots of functions in it.

One of the most sophisticated Cad software I had used in time, almost everything from scrap to prototype to final product can be made on this software and made to go for at test run which helps in understandings defects or efficiency of the product.

I didn't like the way of using it as it was a bit difficult to use it for a beginner as the instructions for how to use a tool is difficult to understand

ANSYS has helped me to optimize in the drawing field and make high quality drawings.

It has a great feature of designing and modelling of your need. It also has online tutoring about drawing if the user don't know how to use the software. This software has very high accuracy.

Although it is a great designing software, but there can be still some improvement in the structure modelling part. Everything except this is awesome.

As a student, ANSYS has been extremely helpful for my projects and assignments.

I used ANSYS extensively for the analysis of mechanical components. ANSYS APDL is easy to use and follows step-by-step procedures. Other platforms of ANSYS like the fluent is also very versatile. The software can be used to analyze simple to extremely complicated processes and structures.

The documentation is not very good and getting help about projects and analyses is a bit difficult at the start. The software is memory intensive and requires performance computers for smooth operation.

I used Ansys Fluent. My main focus was aeroacoustics. But I also used it for aerodynamics simulations.

I used this tool for Fluent. Aerodynamics simulations are nice and easy. I got used to it very fast. And cheap.

Aeroacoustics capability is not effective for 1:1 scale vehicle (car) models. Actually, it is not a problem of the tool, but the method it uses. I prefer LBM based softwares compared to N-S solutions. LBM is more practical in terms of time, but expensive.

Ansys constantly develops new tools and techniques for fast & accurate simulations. If you have a team of engineers who need advanced simulation capabilities with simple UI, it's the best simulation tool available.

Ansys is an industry leading software for structural and thermal similation. It's modular approach to setting up multi-physics simulation makes it easy and intuitive to use even for beginner users. But don't let its simplicity fool you. If you know what you are doing it can pretty much let you adjust every single simulation parameter from meshing to solver settings. Geometry cleaning / preparation and meshing is perhaps the most time consuming aspect of running a simulation. Ansys' adaptive mesh refinement does an outstanding job of meshing the geometry automatically which is great for a first pass analysis. You can pass results from one simulation to other just by dragging and dropping an arrow in UI

Unlike Abaqus which includes everything in one single license, you will need to purchase different modules for advanced simulations (non-linear, dynamic, fatigue etc.) which can be very expensive.

I used ANSYS for my research during my masters and also my phD.

This software is much more user friendly compared with other 3D simulations programs. I think the learning curve is shorter compared with programs like abaqus. However, abaqus provides more capabilities and also introduces material subroutines and the capability of incorporating your own code with the program. However, I think ANSYS has included those capabilities in their more recent versions. They also have the CFD ( coupled fluid dynamics to their program) which is great to model interaction of fluids with solids

It is a very computationally heavy program and it crashed a lot when I was using it. However, my setup of the time was not really strong so I was to blame as well for that.

Overall great software whoever interested with fluid dynamics simulation.

I used the fluent of ansys product series. It is quite famous in the industry and provides very powerful solutions.

The learning curve its not easy. Some methods are not as robust as the others. The error diagnostics can be hard some complex models

Ansys has helped me many aspects. The project I did in my undergraduate was done with the help of ansys.

Ansys is free to use. This is the best software for students in learning phase to practice simulation about fluid.

Ansys needs a proper guidance before using it. And it requires a powerful computer for fast and accurate simulation.

I have analysed FEA through ANSYS.helps to prepare the better model

We can calculate various parameters like stress, safety margin,total deformation and also helps in finding out how good mesh is

The version keeps on updating so have to learn again.I used 19.1 before but now I am using 19.2.Also it should provide student version easily

Easy to use and wide capabilities in industrial application

Less of source file availability and cost of ownership

It is a helpful software though it can be more user-friendly.

It gives reliable simulation results before manufacturing a device. At each version tries to solve the software problems.

Sketching a system is harder compare than similar software. The user's help document is not practical because of lacking enough examples.

It is a perfect assistant for applications such as simulations, analysis, , design verification, etc. I have used ANSY's mostly for static, dynamic and thermal analysis. It was challenging to learn to use this software, but after getting hang of it, making complex analysis became relatively easy task.

+ It makes possible modelling and solving many kind of engineering application in a practical way and short period of time.

- It takes so much effort to be good at ANSYS.

I have worked with SolidWorks for design 3D models. But when it comes to simulation Solidworks have very limited options. Then seniors suggest me to use ANSYS for the simulation purposes. More advanced simulations can be modelled with ANSYS. It is a great tool. Plenty of tutorials can be found online. Correctly following the design steps will lead to successful simulation.

This tool is recommended by most of the professional experts for the simulation of 3D models. Basic operations are very similar to ordinary CAD tools. Advanced simulations can be modelled and simulated. Lot of tutorials and documentation are available on the internet.

It requires basic mechanical engineering knowledge there for not much suitable for beginners. Highly advanced tool than other CAD tools. Simulations require a lot of processing power and time. Therefore it is hard to run simulations on Laptops.

Overall its a good experience compared to other softwares used

Ansys is user friendly software to use. I used it for subsea pipelines buckling and walking analysis. Computation is easy and help page is very useful to find out the application

It takes more time to compute longer models especially when you have more degrees of freedom and constraints applied to the model

Users can combine multiple workbenches to carry out complex simulations.

By default, ANSYS can only use one core on an AMD CPU as opposed to four on Intel CPU.

CFD simulationos for various purposes

The math tools available in the software which make it viabole for a huge range of problems. We'rw an exlcusive ansys partner and work very closely with them on multiple tasks

Sometimes takes time to solve and converge and ansys meshing isn't very good comapred to the solver

It has so many option for simulation. Lots of tutorial available

Sometimes some simulations are not run for boundary condition error.But it does not say exactly.

It's a great software for especially engineers that need simulations and calculations to resolve for their problems.

I'm using ANSYS since college as it helped a lot with my engineering projects and now I continue at work for mechanical and structural analysis now.

When I get an error for analysis, I can't find the reason easily. There are huge tutorials for the software but it's not so easy to find the problems solutions.

Ansys WB is quite complex tool with multiple modules. You can make any of the engineering calculations (simulations) here. It works with finite element method. It has too many modules as I only know solid and fluid modules I use them on my both academical studies and design business.

It is really complex, deep as ocean! Especially if you are working on the remote areas of engineering, it could be a night mare. Customer support knows basics that is OK however they can not always support you on your deep and complex problems. Also on Fluent module is not really capable for "mass transfer".

User friendly interface compared to other tools. Visualisation options are enough.

Difficult to entegrate it with a PLM program. Ergo, file management is bad

ANSYS Fluent is the best program in the market.I think there isn't any good alternative for fluent analysis

The calculation time is quite good ,I was using another program ,it took 2 times from Ansys Fluent. Flexibility is another good point ,I can add c++ codes inside the program.

It always gives a result even if I entered a silly numbers ,it always calculates a number and does not give an error so I always get a result but other programs such as preprocessor gambit always gives an error and you adjust your mesh or other silly numbers.

I use it in both work & educational studies widely, while solving vehicle system problems coming from the field. Before making any physical changes, I can first run an analysis to see the results which saves time and money.

It has too many different tools embedded which allows one to perform different types of analyses ranging from structural to CFD, or even electrical and thermal management. One can also create his/her own models and use the meshing tool without needing any other application.

Some of its tools allocates too much memory of computer while some other tools do not, which appears to be an optimization issue.

I liked this software

Non linear Structural Analysis, Wear Analysis

XFEM capability. Thermo mechanical capabilty can be improved

A superb tool to fulfill one's analysis needs. Easy transfer of models into the arena makes it the optimum choice for simulations.

I wish the user interface was worked on a bit, in order to make it a bit user-friendly.

powerful - no competitor can compete with this environment. It's best when it comes to user friendly design, performing actual calculation on server and when doing postprocessing.

definitely price tag is rather high. it probably is not that accessible for small business because of that.

Quality of result relies on a good preprocess setup, and thus on the good understanding of FEA.

Very clear and transparent, it makes you understand how FEA works. Lots of help and tutorials online.

Somehow raw environment. Graphics quality is low.

ANSYS is very powerful. It can do pretty much any type of finite element analysis you need to do.

You have to have a very firm grasp of what you are trying to do. There is virtually no guidance inside the software. If you don't know what you are doing you WILL get bogus results.

Getting past the initial learning curve of knowing how to properly setup a simulation, without over-constraining the system, can be quite frustrating. But when done properly, with help from experts and online resources, the end results can be extremely valuable for research and design applications in engineering, and can help guide future design improvements.

The numerous features available in ANSYS make it essential for design verification and modeling. As a graduate researcher, designing a new experimental apparatus necessitates knowing the potential loading that will be imposed on the system, and even the flow field analysis (checking for laminar flow). ANSYS provides enough online resources to quickly learn how to create a model, create an adequate mesh, and setup the proper boundary and load conditions for the analysis. The end results have aided in improving engineering designs. I highly recommend learning and being exposed to ANSYS early as an engineer.

The overall interface is not that user-friendly at first. A lot of the different setup parameters, whether meshing, boundary conditions, load conditions, physical constants, or mesh type, are all often found on their own separate drop-down window, which makes navigating between different settings and properly setting up the model quite confusing at first.

This gives you the opportunity to program and simulate complex problems. It reduces expensive experimental setup and gives you the ability to outline projects.

Tough to learn and expertise. User interface is not very friendly for initial learning.

Overall good, it's the software I learned finite element analysis on and still my platform of choice for that type of work. It's not my preferred software for 3D modeling, but if I'm doing modeling in conjunction with analysis, then I do prefer ANSYS mechanical.

I like that there is varied functionality built into the same interface. I like being able to build a model in the workbench and then perform finite element analysis on it in the same software package rather than transferring the model to some other software. The FEA simulations are pretty straightforward to set up and get running.

It can be a little buggy. A coworker and I could run the exact same simulation on the exact same model and end up with different results. Not always sure what the issues are, but could potentially be improved with more user testing.

1.) Its topology optimization in a latest update provides accurate results against shape optimization in old versions.

1.) It requires a wealth of knowledge and experience including theoretical &

It has allowed me to simulate and improve some designs that were assigned to me as a project in a university class. Personally I have used it but its complexity means that every time I have to study the software a bit more to use some available tool

The realism in the simulation models of this software are incredible, since they are very close to reality. The available controls allow to evaluate any variable and part that is desired. It has the option of optimizing results to reach a response that improves the performance of what is being designed and tested.

The complexity of the software makes the learning curve quite slow, despite the support found on the internet, some terminology must be known before using the software and it is not described very well in some cases.

It has facilitated the resolution of problems applied to mechanical engineering.

Number of options offered for analysis and simulations in engineering.

It is expensive software.

The Ansys mechanical Suite allow to analyze complex systems in a easy way, with a lot of possibilities and materials library. Is powerful, easy to use, and easy to integrate with other solutions in and ouside of the suite

Maybe the price, and web or mobile app for sharing data and export data results. Also if you need to use muti core solver you need to paid for it.

ANSYS mechanical is relatively intuitive. The results that the software displays are great in that they are very concrete and useful for research.

ANSYS may sometimes display error messages that are a bit unexplainable. Unfortunately, this makes the experience a bit more negative.

confidence in the results. Simulations easy to program. For basic simulations the response time is fast. This helped me in my degree

Easy program to use. Various engineering topics. Fluids, stresses and deformations, static systems and dynamic systems.

This is a difficult program to learn. It is a bit expensive program. Many options must be configured.

It allowed me to develop an important part of my university thesis, serving as a professional tool to study the mechanical behavior of the material studied and validate my previous simulations.

It forms part of the workbench interface, which allows this module to be linked with another tools without problems.

It has an outdated graphical interface that does not facilitate the use of the program.

Extremely accurate simulation results

Contains multiple analysis suite packages for all types of analysis; static, dynamic, structural, thermal, model, flow, etc..

Not easy to use at first. Need to understand the setup and process of the analysis to actually run a creditable study