Categorie:
Ferramentas de teste de automação /
Software de gerenciamento de código-fonte /
Codificação Reveja
| Excelente | |
| Boa | |
| Média | |
| Mau | |
| Horrível |
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request. It reports back the impact of every commit or pull request in new issues concerning code style, best practices, security and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. It allows developers to save time in code reviews and tackle efficiently technical debt.
It's static analysis without the hassle. JavaScript, Scala, PHP, Python and CSS are currently supported.
Comentário deixado em 04/10/2020
Code Quality is hard to maintain with ever-increasing team sizes, so we're attempting to use Codacy to scan our code, find issues, and tag them before they get merged into the repository. So far the in-line explanations with the issues that Codacy has tagged have been well received and developers like the context these provide. We need to do some significant tuning to adjust the Signal To Noise ratio, but it's growing more useful daily.
The ability to customize patterns and see grades for Projects and individual files are key to this software. It's a great alternative to Code Climate. It has an on-prem solution that was a requirement for our team, and thus far it has been well received and well reviewed by our teams.
The enterprise (on-prem) solution is expensive (2.5x more expensive than the hosted license per seat). Additionally the support team is very slow to respond, often responding more than 24 hours later and missing questions in the original email. They're friendly and helpful if you can get them on a video conference, but the email support leaves much to be desired.
The ability to customize patterns and see grades for Projects and individual files are key to this software. It's a great alternative to Code Climate. It has an on-prem solution that was a requirement for our team, and thus far it has been well received and well reviewed by our teams. The enterprise (on-prem) solution is expensive (2.5x more expensive than the hosted license per seat). Additionally the support team is very slow to respond, often responding more than 24 hours later and missing questions in the original email. They're friendly and helpful if you can get them on a video conference, but the email support leaves much to be desired.
Comentário deixado em 03/22/2020
Absolute Master in Automated Code Reviews. Instead of having to manually check for code style, best practices, code security, common errors etc. Codacy detects those automatically for you. The most important informations being the impact in code quality of the recent commits and pull requests.
Comentário deixado em 03/28/2019
- Code review and checkup Session expires if you do not login on routine checkups
Chatra
::
AMX
::
KPMG Spark
::
AOMEI Backupper
::
iVoxx
Comentário deixado em 03/28/2019
Most of the projects and code we write is in Jupyter notebook. Thus we have to add python code seperately so as to get evaluated.
It is better when you work overnight and make a coding development on which you are proud of. There comes codacy where you can rate the quality of your code. Real time updates makes it more fit.
Pricing is quite high and codacy disconnects your repository when not in use.
It is better when you work overnight and make a coding development on which you are proud of. There comes codacy where you can rate the quality of your code. Real time updates makes it more fit. Pricing is quite high and codacy disconnects your repository when not in use.
Comentário deixado em 03/14/2018
Great and intuitive User Interface. Big saving time. Possibility to define issue-based goals to improve the Codebase. Checking lots of security issues. Easy Setup and Customization. There is no hotspots or quick wins. Incomplete documentation in some parts. It's impossible to prioritize the issues.